Introduction

This is an analysis of spam received at a set of spam traps during the week of Monday May 24th 2004 (ISO week number 22, from Monday May 24th 2004 to Sunday May 30th 2004 inclusive). Most of the spam traps are expired or non-existent accounts, the remaining few have been unused for a long time with no legitimate email traffic. All the expired addresses have been bouncing mail for over a year, most for more then three. None of the spam traps have been actively seeded to receive spam. For the purpose of this report, spam is defined as any message delivered to these spam traps. All times and dates are relative to UTC.

While it is impossible to say with any level of certainty how representative these numbers are of spam in general, I believe they are close enough to provide useful information to anyone interested in spam or spam prevention.

Summary

A short summary of this weeks numbers.

Total number of messages:
2943
Unique message bodies:
2714
Unique sender IP addresses:
2076
Average message size:
7282

Client DNS

Reverse DNS

The client IP address is looked up in DNS at the time of delivery. The following shows the number of clients with and without published reverse DNS information, and the number of clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Clients without reverse DNS:
675 (22.9%)
Clients with reverse DNS:
2268 (77.1%)
Clients with matching forward and reverse DNS:
2081 (70.7%)

Originating Domain

The 10 most frequent domains (reverse excluding the host name/left most label). Only clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information are considered. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients within the given domain. Percentage is relative to the number of messages delivered from clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Domain Count Percentage
moosq.com 143 6.9%
client.comcast.net 116 5.6%
tekmailer.com 76 3.7%
imgsvr.com 43 2.1%
t3media.net 38 1.8%
bestthings247.com 37 1.8%
dyn.optonline.net 27 1.3%
rmtn.com 27 1.3%
ne.client2.attbi.com 26 1.2%
optssvr.net 25 1.2%

Client Countries

Client Country Distribution

Client country is determined using the WebHosting.Info ip-to-country data. Data is updated monthly if there are updates available. This shows the top 15 countries for delivering clients. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients in the given country. Percentage is relative to the total number of messages received in the reporting period.

oos-contry.png

Contry Count Percentage
United States 1331 45.2%
*unknown* 514 17.5%
Republic Of Korea 283 9.6%
China 143 4.9%
Brazil 89 3%
Canada 77 2.6%
Japan 62 2.1%
Hong Kong 41 1.4%
Spain 37 1.3%
United Kingdom 30 1%
France 27 0.9%
Taiwan 21 0.7%
Mexico 21 0.7%
Netherlands 18 0.6%
Israel 17 0.6%

Senders

Claimed Sender Domains

Domain name claimed in envelope sender addresses. It is commonly accepted that a significant share of all spam is sent with a forged sender address, so the following list is useless for identifying message origin. It is included here to show spammers domain preference when forging sender addresses.

Domain Count Percentage
yahoo.com 161 5.5%
msn.com 110 3.7%
hotmail.com 105 3.6%
DiscountAlert.com 35 1.2%
drdsvr.com 33 1.1%
britmilla.com 31 1.1%
bestthings247.com 27 0.9%
stderr.crystalholdings.com 22 0.7%
real-coupons.com 20 0.7%
4epurchase.com 17 0.6%

Clients

A port scan is performed on all clients delivering messages to spam traps. The scan is started as soon as possible after message delivery, usually within a few seconds.

Please note that in cases where the client is located behind a router or firewall doing NAT, the target of the scan may be the router/firewall not the sending client.

Services On Unfiltered Ports

Services are identified by nmaps version detection feature. The following lists the 15 most common services found on unfiltered ports. The count is the number of distinct IP addresses, the percentage is relative to the total number of distinct IP addresses seen within the reporting period.

Service Count Percentage
Microsoft Windows msrpc 748 36%
Microsoft Windows UPnP 561 27%
Apache httpd 212 10.2%
OpenSSH 199 9.6%
Microsoft Windows XP microsoft-ds 153 7.4%
Microsoft mstask 111 5.3%
Sendmail smtpd 89 4.3%
Microsoft Terminal Service 80 3.9%
Microsoft IIS webserver 67 3.2%
Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator 55 2.6%
Microsoft DNS 52 2.5%
Microsoft Windows 2000 microsoft-ds 47 2.3%
MySQL 44 2.1%
Microsoft ESMTP 36 1.7%
ISC Bind 35 1.7%

Client OS Vendor

Client operating systems are identified by nmaps TCP/IP fingerprinting feature. The following lists the 10 most common client operating system vendors. In cases where TCP/IP fingerprinting did not successfully identify the clients operating systems, it is listed as *unknown*.

oos-os-vendor.png

Vendor Count Percentage
Microsoft 1117 53.8%
*unknown* 558 26.9%
Linux 226 10.9%
FreeBSD 115 5.5%
Turtle 35 1.7%
Apple 12 0.6%
Sun 7 0.3%
Cisco 5 0.2%
Cnet 4 0.2%
3Com 3 0.1%

Time Distribution

Day of Week

Distribution of messages over days of week. The count shows the number of messages received on each day, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-day-of-week.png

Day Count Percentage
Mon 424 14.4%
Tue 446 15.2%
Wed 493 16.8%
Thu 452 15.4%
Fri 455 15.5%
Sat 363 12.3%
Sun 310 10.5%

Time of Day

Distribution of messages over time of day. 00 describes the hour from 00:00 to 01:00. The count shows the number of messages received within each hour, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-time-of-day.png

Hour Count Percentage
00 143 4.9%
01 123 4.2%
02 134 4.6%
03 135 4.6%
04 114 3.9%
05 123 4.2%
06 107 3.6%
07 130 4.4%
08 107 3.6%
09 79 2.7%
10 101 3.4%
11 116 3.9%
Hour Count Percentage
12 140 4.8%
13 104 3.5%
14 130 4.4%
15 139 4.7%
16 116 3.9%
17 127 4.3%
18 123 4.2%
19 123 4.2%
20 116 3.9%
21 126 4.3%
22 154 5.2%
23 133 4.5%

Size Distribution

Message Size Distribution

Message size distribution over all messages. Count is the number of messages within the given size range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-size.png

Size Count Percentage
1.5KiB > size >= 0.5KiB 997 33.9%
2.5KiB > size >= 1.5KiB 489 16.6%
3.5KiB > size >= 2.5KiB 412 14%
4.5KiB > size >= 3.5KiB 240 8.2%
5.5KiB > size >= 4.5KiB 183 6.2%
0.5KiB > size >= 0 135 4.6%
6.5KiB > size >= 5.5KiB 74 2.5%
7.5KiB > size >= 6.5KiB 55 1.9%
9.5KiB > size >= 8.5KiB 51 1.7%
8.5KiB > size >= 7.5KiB 51 1.7%

DNS Block Lists

These numbers shows the presence of the sending client in a DNS block list at the time of message delivery. The selection of DNS block lists may be updated on a monthly basis.

Senders In DNS Block Lists

Sending clients present in DNS block list at the time of delivery. The count is the total number of messages delivered from clients listed in the respective block list. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

DNS block list Count Percentage
bl.spamcop.net 2102 71.4%
cbl.abuseat.org 1345 45.7%
xbl.spamhaus.org 1343 45.6%
dnsbl.ahbl.org 1057 35.9%
sbl.spamhaus.org 1011 34.4%
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net 899 30.5%
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net 396 13.5%
socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net 248 8.4%
http.dnsbl.sorbs.net 207 7%
misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net 141 4.8%
relays.visi.com 135 4.6%
smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net 26 0.9%
relays.ordb.org 10 0.3%
zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net 6 0.2%

DNS Block List Groups

To investigate overlap of the different DNS block lists and the effectiveness of combinations of block lists, the following shows the number of messages delivered from clients listed in at least one of the groups block lists. The set of groups may be updated on a monthly basis.

all:
2652 of 2943(90.1%)
bl.spamcop.net, cbl.abuseat.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
2440 of 2943(82.9%)
bl.spamcop.net and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
2344 of 2943(79.6%)
bl.spamcop.net and cbl.abuseat.org:
2270 of 2943(77.1%)
*.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
1485 of 2943(50.5%)

SpamAssassin

All messages are filtered through SpamAssassin and reports are generated on hit rates excluding Bayesian classification scores.

SpamAssassin Without Bayesian Classifier

SpamAssassin hits when disregarding the result of the Bayesian classifier. The count is the number of messages for the given score range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-sa-only.png

Hits Count Percentage
0 > hits 2 0.1%
5 > hits >= 0 1837 62.4%
10 > hits >= 5 743 25.2%
15 > hits >= 10 271 9.2%
20 > hits >= 15 76 2.6%
hits >= 20 14 0.5%

Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

DCC Matches

Number of matches for the three matching algorithms used by DCC. The DCC servers are queried at the time of delivery. The Body, Fuz1 and Fuz2 columns shows the number of messages matched in the count range for their respective algorithm. The Highest column shows the number of hits from the algorithm returning the highest match count. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-dcc.png

Range Body Fuz1 Fuz2 Highest
25 >= count 2831 (96.2%) 2197 (74.7%) 1222 (41.5%) 1170 (39.8%)
50 >= count > 25 0 (0%) 5 (0.2%) 40 (1.4%) 35 (1.2%)
75 >= count > 50 5 (0.2%) 33 (1.1%) 109 (3.7%) 99 (3.4%)
100 >= count > 75 0 (0%) 21 (0.7%) 84 (2.9%) 75 (2.5%)
count > 100 107 (3.6%) 687 (23.3%) 1488 (50.6%) 1564 (53.1%)

About

On the Origin Of Spam is published as weekly and monthly reports by B. Johannessen in the hope that it will be useful to the anti-spam community.