Introduction

This is an analysis of spam received at a set of spam traps during the week of Monday April 19th 2004 (ISO week number 17, from Monday April 19th 2004 to Sunday April 25th 2004 inclusive). Most of the spam traps are expired or non-existent accounts, the remaining few have been unused for a long time with no legitimate email traffic. All the expired addresses have been bouncing mail for over a year, most for more then three. None of the spam traps have been actively seeded to receive spam. For the purpose of this report, spam is defined as any message delivered to these spam traps. All times and dates are relative to UTC.

While it is impossible to say with any level of certainty how representative these numbers are of spam in general, I believe they are close enough to provide useful information to anyone interested in spam or spam prevention.

Summary

A short summary of this weeks numbers.

Total number of messages:
3612
Unique message bodies:
3435
Unique sender IP addresses:
2238
Average message size:
6439

Client DNS

Reverse DNS

The client IP address is looked up in DNS at the time of delivery. The following shows the number of clients with and without published reverse DNS information, and the number of clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Clients without reverse DNS:
667 (18.5%)
Clients with reverse DNS:
2945 (81.5%)
Clients with matching forward and reverse DNS:
2762 (76.5%)

Originating Domain

The 10 most frequent domains (reverse excluding the host name/left most label). Only clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information are considered. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients within the given domain. Percentage is relative to the number of messages delivered from clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Domain Count Percentage
moosq.com 259 9.4%
client.comcast.net 150 5.4%
wwwmailman.com 119 4.3%
tekmailer.com 115 4.2%
errr0.com 84 3%
mailmmm.com 62 2.2%
optoptopt.com 55 2%
jwqqq.com 52 1.9%
wwwoptinmail.com 40 1.4%
ne.client2.attbi.com 35 1.3%

Client Countries

Client Country Distribution

Client country is determined using the WebHosting.Info ip-to-country data. Data is updated monthly if there are updates available. This shows the top 15 countries for delivering clients. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients in the given country. Percentage is relative to the total number of messages received in the reporting period.

oos-contry.png

Contry Count Percentage
United States 2070 57.3%
*unknown* 442 12.2%
China 194 5.4%
Republic Of Korea 143 4%
Brazil 107 3%
Canada 105 2.9%
Japan 59 1.6%
France 49 1.4%
Hong Kong 43 1.2%
United Kingdom 35 1%
Spain 34 0.9%
Taiwan 34 0.9%
Mexico 29 0.8%
Netherlands 24 0.7%
Israel 24 0.7%

Senders

Claimed Sender Domains

Domain name claimed in envelope sender addresses. It is commonly accepted that a significant share of all spam is sent with a forged sender address, so the following list is useless for identifying message origin. It is included here to show spammers domain preference when forging sender addresses.

Domain Count Percentage
yahoo.com 165 4.6%
msn.com 123 3.4%
hotmail.com 104 2.9%
thehdhd.com 33 0.9%
DiscountAlert.com 22 0.6%
drdsvr.com 22 0.6%
20 0.6%
carefulchristianconsumer.com 19 0.5%
4epurchase.com 18 0.5%
168.com 17 0.5%

Clients

A port scan is performed on all clients delivering messages to spam traps. The scan is started as soon as possible after message delivery, usually within a few seconds.

Please note that in cases where the client is located behind a router or firewall doing NAT, the target of the scan may be the router/firewall not the sending client.

Services On Unfiltered Ports

Services are identified by nmaps version detection feature. The following lists the 15 most common services found on unfiltered ports. The count is the number of distinct IP addresses, the percentage is relative to the total number of distinct IP addresses seen within the reporting period.

Service Count Percentage
Microsoft Windows msrpc 976 43.6%
Microsoft Windows UPnP 662 29.6%
Microsoft Windows XP microsoft-ds 291 13%
Apache httpd 256 11.4%
OpenSSH 209 9.3%
Sendmail smtpd 129 5.8%
Microsoft mstask 113 5%
Microsoft IIS webserver 84 3.8%
Microsoft Terminal Service 81 3.6%
MySQL 63 2.8%
Microsoft ESMTP 57 2.5%
Microsoft DNS 54 2.4%
Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator 51 2.3%
Microsoft Windows 2000 microsoft-ds 51 2.3%
ISC Bind 48 2.1%

Client OS Vendor

Client operating systems are identified by nmaps TCP/IP fingerprinting feature. The following lists the 10 most common client operating system vendors. In cases where TCP/IP fingerprinting did not successfully identify the clients operating systems, it is listed as *unknown*.

oos-os-vendor.png

Vendor Count Percentage
Microsoft 1220 54.5%
*unknown* 556 24.8%
Linux 239 10.7%
FreeBSD 209 9.3%
Turtle 29 1.3%
Apple 21 0.9%
IBM 6 0.3%
Cisco 4 0.2%
Sun 4 0.2%
Alcatel 2 0.1%

Time Distribution

Day of Week

Distribution of messages over days of week. The count shows the number of messages received on each day, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-day-of-week.png

Day Count Percentage
Mon 523 14.5%
Tue 577 16%
Wed 531 14.7%
Thu 511 14.1%
Fri 505 14%
Sat 456 12.6%
Sun 509 14.1%

Time of Day

Distribution of messages over time of day. 00 describes the hour from 00:00 to 01:00. The count shows the number of messages received within each hour, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-time-of-day.png

Hour Count Percentage
00 153 4.2%
01 167 4.6%
02 161 4.5%
03 155 4.3%
04 143 4%
05 174 4.8%
06 155 4.3%
07 113 3.1%
08 135 3.7%
09 114 3.2%
10 134 3.7%
11 171 4.7%
Hour Count Percentage
12 168 4.7%
13 161 4.5%
14 127 3.5%
15 141 3.9%
16 167 4.6%
17 143 4%
18 131 3.6%
19 129 3.6%
20 175 4.8%
21 164 4.5%
22 167 4.6%
23 164 4.5%

Size Distribution

Message Size Distribution

Message size distribution over all messages. Count is the number of messages within the given size range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-size.png

Size Count Percentage
1.5KiB > size >= 0.5KiB 946 26.2%
2.5KiB > size >= 1.5KiB 902 25%
3.5KiB > size >= 2.5KiB 558 15.4%
4.5KiB > size >= 3.5KiB 312 8.6%
0.5KiB > size >= 0 157 4.3%
5.5KiB > size >= 4.5KiB 149 4.1%
7.5KiB > size >= 6.5KiB 113 3.1%
6.5KiB > size >= 5.5KiB 96 2.7%
8.5KiB > size >= 7.5KiB 50 1.4%
38.5KiB > size >= 37.5KiB 38 1.1%

DNS Block Lists

These numbers shows the presence of the sending client in a DNS block list at the time of message delivery. The selection of DNS block lists may be updated on a monthly basis.

Senders In DNS Block Lists

Sending clients present in DNS block list at the time of delivery. The count is the total number of messages delivered from clients listed in the respective block list. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

DNS block list Count Percentage
bl.spamcop.net 2777 76.9%
sbl.spamhaus.org 1493 41.3%
dnsbl.ahbl.org 1475 40.8%
cbl.abuseat.org 1397 38.7%
xbl.spamhaus.org 1390 38.5%
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net 1014 28.1%
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net 982 27.2%
socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net 246 6.8%
http.dnsbl.sorbs.net 228 6.3%
relays.visi.com 106 2.9%
smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net 30 0.8%
misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net 21 0.6%
relays.ordb.org 9 0.2%
zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net 5 0.1%

DNS Block List Groups

To investigate overlap of the different DNS block lists and the effectiveness of combinations of block lists, the following shows the number of messages delivered from clients listed in at least one of the groups block lists. The set of groups may be updated on a monthly basis.

all:
3320 of 3612(91.9%)
bl.spamcop.net, cbl.abuseat.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
3029 of 3612(83.9%)
bl.spamcop.net and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
2977 of 3612(82.4%)
bl.spamcop.net and cbl.abuseat.org:
2868 of 3612(79.4%)
*.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
2164 of 3612(59.9%)

SpamAssassin

All messages are filtered through SpamAssassin and reports are generated on hit rates excluding Bayesian classification scores.

SpamAssassin Without Bayesian Classifier

SpamAssassin hits when disregarding the result of the Bayesian classifier. The count is the number of messages for the given score range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-sa-only.png

Hits Count Percentage
0 > hits 3 0.1%
5 > hits >= 0 2277 63%
10 > hits >= 5 914 25.3%
15 > hits >= 10 293 8.1%
20 > hits >= 15 86 2.4%
hits >= 20 39 1.1%

Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

DCC Matches

Number of matches for the three matching algorithms used by DCC. The DCC servers are queried at the time of delivery. The Body, Fuz1 and Fuz2 columns shows the number of messages matched in the count range for their respective algorithm. The Highest column shows the number of hits from the algorithm returning the highest match count. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-dcc.png

Range Body Fuz1 Fuz2 Highest
25 >= count 3529 (97.7%) 2798 (77.5%) 1054 (29.2%) 1005 (27.8%)
50 >= count > 25 2 (0.1%) 14 (0.4%) 38 (1.1%) 39 (1.1%)
75 >= count > 50 1 (0%) 22 (0.6%) 102 (2.8%) 92 (2.5%)
100 >= count > 75 2 (0.1%) 20 (0.6%) 104 (2.9%) 91 (2.5%)
count > 100 78 (2.2%) 758 (21%) 2314 (64.1%) 2385 (66%)

About

On the Origin Of Spam is published as weekly and monthly reports by B. Johannessen in the hope that it will be useful to the anti-spam community.