Introduction

This is an analysis of spam received at a set of spam traps during the week of Monday February 23rd 2004 (ISO week number 09, from Monday February 23rd 2004 to Sunday February 29th 2004 inclusive). Most of the spam traps are expired or non-existent accounts, the remaining few have been unused for a long time with no legitimate email traffic. All the expired addresses have been bouncing mail for over a year, most for more then three. None of the spam traps have been actively seeded to receive spam. For the purpose of this report, spam is defined as any message delivered to these spam traps. All times and dates are relative to UTC.

While it is impossible to say with any level of certainty how representative these numbers are of spam in general, I believe they are close enough to provide useful information to anyone interested in spam or spam prevention.

Summary

A short summary of this weeks numbers.

Total number of messages:
2705
Unique message bodies:
2591
Unique sender IP addresses:
1915
Average message size:
5667

Client DNS

Reverse DNS

The client IP address is looked up in DNS at the time of delivery. The following shows the number of clients with and without published reverse DNS information, and the number of clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Clients without reverse DNS:
488 (18%)
Clients with reverse DNS:
2217 (82%)
Clients with matching forward and reverse DNS:
2043 (75.5%)

Originating Domain

The 10 most frequent domains (reverse excluding the host name/left most label). Only clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information are considered. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients within the given domain. Percentage is relative to the number of messages delivered from clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Domain Count Percentage
moosq.com 167 8.2%
client.comcast.net 127 6.2%
com 95 4.7%
jwqqq.com 83 4.1%
tekmailer.com 79 3.9%
mailmmm.com 39 1.9%
optinmaildomain.com 36 1.8%
sheck-buy.com 29 1.4%
ss01.net 29 1.4%
t3media.net 22 1.1%

Client Countries

Client Country Distribution

Client country is determined using the WebHosting.Info ip-to-country data. Data is updated monthly if there are updates available. This shows the top 15 countries for delivering clients. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients in the given country. Percentage is relative to the total number of messages received in the reporting period.

oos-contry.png

Contry Count Percentage
United States 1860 68.8%
China 145 5.4%
Republic Of Korea 108 4%
Canada 87 3.2%
Brazil 57 2.1%
France 40 1.5%
*unknown* 39 1.4%
Spain 26 1%
Netherlands 25 0.9%
Mexico 24 0.9%
United Kingdom 22 0.8%
India 21 0.8%
Taiwan 20 0.7%
Germany 19 0.7%
Japan 16 0.6%

Senders

Claimed Sender Domains

Domain name claimed in envelope sender addresses. It is commonly accepted that a significant share of all spam is sent with a forged sender address, so the following list is useless for identifying message origin. It is included here to show spammers domain preference when forging sender addresses.

Domain Count Percentage
yahoo.com 136 5%
hotmail.com 80 3%
msn.com 54 2%
32 1.2%
sheck-buy.com 29 1.1%
m10.t3media.net 22 0.8%
syndicatesales.biz 22 0.8%
aol.com 20 0.7%
alluringads.com 18 0.7%
mail.com 17 0.6%

Clients

A port scan is performed on all clients delivering messages to spam traps. The scan is started as soon as possible after message delivery, usually within a few seconds.

Please note that in cases where the client is located behind a router or firewall doing NAT, the target of the scan may be the router/firewall not the sending client.

Services On Unfiltered Ports

Services are identified by nmaps version detection feature. The following lists the 15 most common services found on unfiltered ports. The count is the number of distinct IP addresses, the percentage is relative to the total number of distinct IP addresses seen within the reporting period.

Service Count Percentage
Microsoft Windows msrpc 816 42.6%
Microsoft Windows UPnP 512 26.7%
Apache httpd 296 15.5%
Microsoft Windows XP microsoft-ds 270 14.1%
OpenSSH 184 9.6%
Sendmail smtpd 184 9.6%
Microsoft mstask 152 7.9%
Microsoft IIS webserver 79 4.1%
Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator 78 4.1%
bsd-ftpd 76 4%
Microsoft Terminal Service 75 3.9%
MySQL 63 3.3%
Microsoft ESMTP 61 3.2%
Microsoft ftpd 46 2.4%
Microsoft DNS 45 2.3%

Client OS Vendor

Client operating systems are identified by nmaps TCP/IP fingerprinting feature. The following lists the 10 most common client operating system vendors. In cases where TCP/IP fingerprinting did not successfully identify the clients operating systems, it is listed as *unknown*.

oos-os-vendor.png

Vendor Count Percentage
Microsoft 984 51.4%
*unknown* 378 19.7%
FreeBSD 259 13.5%
Linux 235 12.3%
Apple 22 1.1%
Turtle 20 1%
IBM 10 0.5%
3Com 4 0.2%
Sun 4 0.2%
Cisco 3 0.2%

Time Distribution

Day of Week

Distribution of messages over days of week. The count shows the number of messages received on each day, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-day-of-week.png

Day Count Percentage
Mon 325 12%
Tue 334 12.3%
Wed 387 14.3%
Thu 409 15.1%
Fri 418 15.5%
Sat 415 15.3%
Sun 417 15.4%

Time of Day

Distribution of messages over time of day. 00 describes the hour from 00:00 to 01:00. The count shows the number of messages received within each hour, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-time-of-day.png

Hour Count Percentage
00 121 4.5%
01 103 3.8%
02 108 4%
03 119 4.4%
04 111 4.1%
05 108 4%
06 114 4.2%
07 117 4.3%
08 103 3.8%
09 115 4.3%
10 84 3.1%
11 119 4.4%
Hour Count Percentage
12 115 4.3%
13 101 3.7%
14 92 3.4%
15 103 3.8%
16 112 4.1%
17 142 5.2%
18 119 4.4%
19 140 5.2%
20 113 4.2%
21 111 4.1%
22 113 4.2%
23 122 4.5%

Size Distribution

Message Size Distribution

Message size distribution over all messages. Count is the number of messages within the given size range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-size.png

Size Count Percentage
1.5KiB > size >= 0.5KiB 1029 38%
2.5KiB > size >= 1.5KiB 568 21%
3.5KiB > size >= 2.5KiB 347 12.8%
4.5KiB > size >= 3.5KiB 194 7.2%
5.5KiB > size >= 4.5KiB 148 5.5%
6.5KiB > size >= 5.5KiB 79 2.9%
0.5KiB > size >= 0 65 2.4%
7.5KiB > size >= 6.5KiB 61 2.3%
47.5KiB > size >= 46.5KiB 30 1.1%
8.5KiB > size >= 7.5KiB 25 0.9%

DNS Block Lists

These numbers shows the presence of the sending client in a DNS block list at the time of message delivery. The selection of DNS block lists may be updated on a monthly basis.

Senders In DNS Block Lists

Sending clients present in DNS block list at the time of delivery. The count is the total number of messages delivered from clients listed in the respective block list. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

DNS block list Count Percentage
bl.spamcop.net 2151 79.5%
sbl.spamhaus.org 1156 42.7%
dnsbl.ahbl.org 1144 42.3%
xbl.spamhaus.org 1014 37.5%
cbl.abuseat.org 1012 37.4%
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net 757 28%
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net 494 18.3%
socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net 255 9.4%
http.dnsbl.sorbs.net 250 9.2%
relays.visi.com 154 5.7%
misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net 17 0.6%
smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net 12 0.4%
relays.ordb.org 8 0.3%
zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net 1 0%

DNS Block List Groups

To investigate overlap of the different DNS block lists and the effectiveness of combinations of block lists, the following shows the number of messages delivered from clients listed in at least one of the groups block lists. The set of groups may be updated on a monthly basis.

all:
2496 of 2705(92.3%)
bl.spamcop.net, cbl.abuseat.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
2318 of 2705(85.7%)
bl.spamcop.net and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
2294 of 2705(84.8%)
bl.spamcop.net and cbl.abuseat.org:
2201 of 2705(81.4%)
*.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
1424 of 2705(52.6%)

SpamAssassin

All messages are filtered through SpamAssassin and reports are generated on hit rates excluding Bayesian classification scores.

SpamAssassin Without Bayesian Classifier

SpamAssassin hits when disregarding the result of the Bayesian classifier. The count is the number of messages for the given score range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-sa-only.png

Hits Count Percentage
0 > hits 127 4.7%
5 > hits >= 0 1471 54.4%
10 > hits >= 5 691 25.5%
15 > hits >= 10 248 9.2%
20 > hits >= 15 96 3.5%
hits >= 20 72 2.7%

Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

DCC Matches

Number of matches for the three matching algorithms used by DCC. The DCC servers are queried at the time of delivery. The Body, Fuz1 and Fuz2 columns shows the number of messages matched in the count range for their respective algorithm. The Highest column shows the number of hits from the algorithm returning the highest match count. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-dcc.png

Range Body Fuz1 Fuz2 Highest
25 >= count 2586 (95.6%) 1939 (71.7%) 735 (27.2%) 658 (24.3%)
50 >= count > 25 5 (0.2%) 10 (0.4%) 47 (1.7%) 28 (1%)
75 >= count > 50 0 (0%) 22 (0.8%) 89 (3.3%) 59 (2.2%)
100 >= count > 75 3 (0.1%) 17 (0.6%) 60 (2.2%) 50 (1.8%)
count > 100 111 (4.1%) 717 (26.5%) 1774 (65.6%) 1910 (70.6%)

About

On the Origin Of Spam is published as weekly and monthly reports by B. Johannessen in the hope that it will be useful to the anti-spam community.