Introduction

This is an analysis of spam received at a set of spam traps during the week of Monday January 26th 2004 (ISO week number 05, from Monday January 26th 2004 to Sunday February 1st 2004 inclusive). Most of the spam traps are expired or non-existent accounts, the remaining few have been unused for a long time with no legitimate email traffic. All the expired addresses have been bouncing mail for over a year, most for more then three. None of the spam traps have been actively seeded to receive spam. For the purpose of this report, spam is defined as any message delivered to these spam traps. All times and dates are relative to UTC.

While it is impossible to say with any level of certainty how representative these numbers are of spam in general, I believe they are close enough to provide useful information to anyone interested in spam or spam prevention.

Summary

A short summary of this weeks numbers.

Total number of messages:
3658
Unique message bodies:
3555
Unique sender IP addresses:
2332
Average message size:
17452

Client DNS

Reverse DNS

The client IP address is looked up in DNS at the time of delivery. The following shows the number of clients with and without published reverse DNS information, and the number of clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Clients without reverse DNS:
863 (23.6%)
Clients with reverse DNS:
2795 (76.4%)
Clients with matching forward and reverse DNS:
2560 (70%)

Originating Domain

The 10 most frequent domains (reverse excluding the host name/left most label). Only clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information are considered. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients within the given domain. Percentage is relative to the number of messages delivered from clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Domain Count Percentage
client.comcast.net 147 5.7%
dyn.optonline.net 40 1.6%
dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net 37 1.4%
cable.mindspring.com 33 1.3%
dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net 28 1.1%
in-addr.btopenworld.com 28 1.1%
dip.t-dialin.net 27 1.1%
intersol.co.th 27 1.1%
dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net 25 1%
dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net 25 1%

Client Countries

Client Country Distribution

Client country is determined using the WebHosting.Info ip-to-country data. Data is updated monthly if there are updates available. This shows the top 15 countries for delivering clients. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients in the given country. Percentage is relative to the total number of messages received in the reporting period.

oos-contry.png

Contry Count Percentage
United States 1872 51.2%
Canada 178 4.9%
Republic Of Korea 141 3.9%
China 131 3.6%
Germany 114 3.1%
France 97 2.7%
United Kingdom 90 2.5%
Netherlands 73 2%
Spain 69 1.9%
Australia 53 1.4%
Poland 50 1.4%
India 49 1.3%
Thailand 48 1.3%
Brazil 48 1.3%
*unknown* 41 1.1%

Senders

Claimed Sender Domains

Domain name claimed in envelope sender addresses. It is commonly accepted that a significant share of all spam is sent with a forged sender address, so the following list is useless for identifying message origin. It is included here to show spammers domain preference when forging sender addresses.

Domain Count Percentage
407 11.1%
yahoo.com 206 5.6%
hotmail.com 63 1.7%
aol.com 48 1.3%
msn.com 39 1.1%
earthlink.net 28 0.8%
championzone.net 19 0.5%
cisco.com 19 0.5%
netapp.com 19 0.5%
canada.com 18 0.5%

Clients

A port scan is performed on all clients delivering messages to spam traps. The scan is started as soon as possible after message delivery, usually within a few seconds.

Please note that in cases where the client is located behind a router or firewall doing NAT, the target of the scan may be the router/firewall not the sending client.

Services On Unfiltered Ports

Services are identified by nmaps version detection feature. The following lists the 15 most common services found on unfiltered ports. The count is the number of distinct IP addresses, the percentage is relative to the total number of distinct IP addresses seen within the reporting period.

Service Count Percentage
Microsoft Windows msrpc 860 36.9%
Microsoft Windows UPnP 571 24.5%
Microsoft Windows XP microsoft-ds 266 11.4%
OpenSSH 208 8.9%
Apache httpd 185 7.9%
Microsoft mstask 160 6.9%
Microsoft IIS webserver 98 4.2%
ISC Bind 86 3.7%
Microsoft Terminal Service 76 3.3%
Sendmail smtpd 76 3.3%
Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator 66 2.8%
MySQL 64 2.7%
Microsoft ESMTP 56 2.4%
KaZaA client 49 2.1%
Microsoft ftpd 46 2%

Client OS Vendor

Client operating systems are identified by nmaps TCP/IP fingerprinting feature. The following lists the 10 most common client operating system vendors. In cases where TCP/IP fingerprinting did not successfully identify the clients operating systems, it is listed as *unknown*.

oos-os-vendor.png

Vendor Count Percentage
Microsoft 1052 45.1%
*unknown* 819 35.1%
Linux 223 9.6%
FreeBSD 106 4.5%
Cisco 25 1.1%
Turtle 24 1%
Sun 23 1%
Apple 10 0.4%
3Com 8 0.3%
Draytek 8 0.3%

Time Distribution

Day of Week

Distribution of messages over days of week. The count shows the number of messages received on each day, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-day-of-week.png

Day Count Percentage
Mon 332 9.1%
Tue 678 18.5%
Wed 574 15.7%
Thu 578 15.8%
Fri 535 14.6%
Sat 469 12.8%
Sun 492 13.4%

Time of Day

Distribution of messages over time of day. 00 describes the hour from 00:00 to 01:00. The count shows the number of messages received within each hour, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-time-of-day.png

Hour Count Percentage
00 151 4.1%
01 173 4.7%
02 149 4.1%
03 148 4%
04 153 4.2%
05 143 3.9%
06 131 3.6%
07 127 3.5%
08 155 4.2%
09 140 3.8%
10 168 4.6%
11 137 3.7%
Hour Count Percentage
12 144 3.9%
13 152 4.2%
14 153 4.2%
15 169 4.6%
16 180 4.9%
17 141 3.9%
18 149 4.1%
19 170 4.6%
20 139 3.8%
21 149 4.1%
22 147 4%
23 190 5.2%

Size Distribution

Message Size Distribution

Message size distribution over all messages. Count is the number of messages within the given size range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-size.png

Size Count Percentage
30.5KiB > size >= 29.5KiB 872 23.8%
1.5KiB > size >= 0.5KiB 751 20.5%
31.5KiB > size >= 30.5KiB 398 10.9%
2.5KiB > size >= 1.5KiB 389 10.6%
3.5KiB > size >= 2.5KiB 289 7.9%
32.5KiB > size >= 31.5KiB 266 7.3%
4.5KiB > size >= 3.5KiB 181 4.9%
33.5KiB > size >= 32.5KiB 101 2.8%
5.5KiB > size >= 4.5KiB 94 2.6%
6.5KiB > size >= 5.5KiB 54 1.5%

DNS Block Lists

These numbers shows the presence of the sending client in a DNS block list at the time of message delivery. The selection of DNS block lists may be updated on a monthly basis.

Senders In DNS Block Lists

Sending clients present in DNS block list at the time of delivery. The count is the total number of messages delivered from clients listed in the respective block list. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

DNS block list Count Percentage
bl.spamcop.net 1461 39.9%
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net 1206 33%
xbl.spamhaus.org 976 26.7%
cbl.abuseat.org 976 26.7%
dnsbl.ahbl.org 461 12.6%
sbl.spamhaus.org 407 11.1%
http.dnsbl.sorbs.net 275 7.5%
socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net 270 7.4%
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net 183 5%
relays.visi.com 76 2.1%
zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net 19 0.5%
relays.ordb.org 15 0.4%
misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net 15 0.4%
smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net 8 0.2%

DNS Block List Groups

To investigate overlap of the different DNS block lists and the effectiveness of combinations of block lists, the following shows the number of messages delivered from clients listed in at least one of the groups block lists. The set of groups may be updated on a monthly basis.

all:
2206 of 3658(60.3%)
bl.spamcop.net, cbl.abuseat.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
2046 of 3658(55.9%)
bl.spamcop.net and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
1989 of 3658(54.4%)
bl.spamcop.net and cbl.abuseat.org:
1584 of 3658(43.3%)
*.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
1608 of 3658(44%)

SpamAssassin

All messages are filtered through SpamAssassin and reports are generated on hit rates excluding Bayesian classification scores.

SpamAssassin Without Bayesian Classifier

SpamAssassin hits when disregarding the result of the Bayesian classifier. The count is the number of messages for the given score range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-sa-only.png

Hits Count Percentage
0 > hits 79 2.2%
5 > hits >= 0 2216 60.6%
10 > hits >= 5 817 22.3%
15 > hits >= 10 255 7%
20 > hits >= 15 161 4.4%
hits >= 20 130 3.6%

Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

DCC Matches

Number of matches for the three matching algorithms used by DCC. The DCC servers are queried at the time of delivery. The Body, Fuz1 and Fuz2 columns shows the number of messages matched in the count range for their respective algorithm. The Highest column shows the number of hits from the algorithm returning the highest match count. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

oos-dcc.png

Range Body Fuz1 Fuz2 Highest
25 >= count 3525 (96.4%) 2348 (64.2%) 1585 (43.3%) 1294 (35.4%)
50 >= count > 25 1 (0%) 21 (0.6%) 11 (0.3%) 15 (0.4%)
75 >= count > 50 7 (0.2%) 59 (1.6%) 34 (0.9%) 29 (0.8%)
100 >= count > 75 4 (0.1%) 85 (2.3%) 24 (0.7%) 26 (0.7%)
count > 100 121 (3.3%) 1145 (31.3%) 2004 (54.8%) 2294 (62.7%)

About

On the Origin Of Spam is published as weekly and monthly reports by B. Johannessen in the hope that it will be useful to the anti-spam community.