Introduction

This is an analysis of spam received at a set of spam traps during the week of Monday December 8th 2003 (ISO week number 50, from Monday December 8th 2003 to Sunday December 14th 2003 inclusive). Most of the spam traps are expired or non-existent accounts, the remaining few have been unused for a long time with no legitimate email traffic. All the expired addresses have been bouncing mail for over a year, most for more then three. None of the spam traps have been actively seeded to receive spam. For the purpose of this report, spam is defined as any message delivered to these spam traps. All times and dates are relative to UTC.

While it is impossible to say with any level of certainty how representative these numbers are of spam in general, I believe they are close enough to provide useful information to anyone interested in spam or spam prevention.

Summary

A short summary of this weeks numbers.

Total number of messages:
1561
Unique message bodies:
1505
Unique sender IP addresses:
1357
Average message size:
3651

Client DNS

Reverse DNS

The client IP address is looked up in DNS at the time of delivery. The following shows the number of clients with and without published reverse DNS information, and the number of clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Clients without reverse DNS:
318 (20.4%)
Clients with reverse DNS:
1243 (79.6%)
Clients with matching forward and reverse DNS:
1134 (72.6%)

Originating Domain

The 10 most frequent domains (reverse excluding the host name/left most label). Only clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information are considered. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients within the given domain. Percentage is relative to the number of messages delivered from clients with matching forward and reverse DNS information.

Domain Count Percentage
client.comcast.net 44 3.9%
attheblue.com 32 2.8%
dyn.optonline.net 29 2.6%
dip.t-dialin.net 24 2.1%
prod-infinitum.com.mx 22 1.9%
true-bargains.net 18 1.6%
ne.client2.attbi.com 16 1.4%
client.mchsi.com 15 1.3%
cpe.net.cable.rogers.com 13 1.1%
client.attbi.com 11 1%

Client Countries

Client Country Distribution

Client country is determined using the WebHosting.Info ip-to-country data. Data is updated monthly if there are updates available. This shows the top 15 countries for delivering clients. Count is the number of messages delivered from clients in the given country. Percentage is relative to the total number of messages received in the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-contry.png

Contry Count Percentage
United States 919 58.9%
Canada 90 5.8%
China 81 5.2%
Republic Of Korea 75 4.8%
Brazil 44 2.8%
Germany 34 2.2%
United Kingdom 30 1.9%
Netherlands 27 1.7%
Mexico 27 1.7%
France 18 1.2%
Sweden 16 1%
Poland 14 0.9%
Spain 14 0.9%
Japan 13 0.8%
Austria 12 0.8%

Senders

Claimed Sender Domains

Domain name claimed in envelope sender addresses. It is commonly accepted that a significant share of all spam is sent with a forged sender address, so the following list is useless for identifying message origin. It is included here to show spammers domain preference when forging sender addresses.

Domain Count Percentage
yahoo.com 127 8.1%
msn.com 46 2.9%
hotmail.com 41 2.6%
aol.com 30 1.9%
earthlink.net 20 1.3%
SB1.trbrgns.com 18 1.2%
swordfishmedia.biz 17 1.1%
hgfhcvvg.com 14 0.9%
mailcity.com 12 0.8%
excite.com 10 0.6%

Clients

A port scan is performed on all clients delivering messages to spam traps. The scan is started as soon as possible after message delivery, usually within a few seconds.

Please note that in cases where the client is located behind a router or firewall doing NAT, the target of the scan may be the router/firewall not the sending client.

Services On Unfiltered Ports

Services are identified by nmaps version detection feature. The following lists the 15 most common services found on unfiltered ports. The count is the number of distinct IP addresses, the percentage is relative to the total number of distinct IP addresses seen within the reporting period.

Service Count Percentage
Microsoft Windows msrpc 668 49.2%
Microsoft Windows UPnP 443 32.6%
Microsoft Windows XP microsoft-ds 192 14.1%
Apache httpd 127 9.4%
Microsoft mstask 102 7.5%
OpenSSH 98 7.2%
Microsoft IIS webserver 87 6.4%
Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator 70 5.2%
Microsoft Terminal Service 68 5%
Sendmail smtpd 60 4.4%
Microsoft ESMTP 51 3.8%
Microsoft DNS 49 3.6%
KaZaA client 42 3.1%
Microsoft ftpd 37 2.7%
MySQL 32 2.4%

Client OS Vendor

Client operating systems are identified by nmaps TCP/IP fingerprinting feature. The following lists the 10 most common client operating system vendors. In cases where TCP/IP fingerprinting did not successfully identify the clients operating systems, it is listed as *unknown*.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-os-vendor.png

Vendor Count Percentage
Microsoft 836 61.6%
*unknown* 246 18.1%
Linux 126 9.3%
FreeBSD 77 5.7%
Cisco 16 1.2%
Turtle 13 1%
IBM 11 0.8%
Cnet 5 0.4%
Smoothwall 4 0.3%
Apple 3 0.2%

Time Distribution

Day of Week

Distribution of messages over days of week. The count shows the number of messages received on each day, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-os-vendor.png

Day Count Percentage
Mon 203 13%
Tue 246 15.8%
Wed 238 15.2%
Thu 239 15.3%
Fri 220 14.1%
Sat 218 14%
Sun 197 12.6%

Time of Day

Distribution of messages over time of day. 00 describes the hour from 00:00 to 01:00. The count shows the number of messages received within each hour, the percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-os-vendor.png

Hour Count Percentage
00 77 4.9%
01 66 4.2%
02 75 4.8%
03 75 4.8%
04 66 4.2%
05 61 3.9%
06 56 3.6%
07 57 3.7%
08 53 3.4%
09 45 2.9%
10 53 3.4%
11 56 3.6%
Hour Count Percentage
12 56 3.6%
13 56 3.6%
14 57 3.7%
15 66 4.2%
16 54 3.5%
17 66 4.2%
18 75 4.8%
19 74 4.7%
20 87 5.6%
21 80 5.1%
22 81 5.2%
23 69 4.4%

Size Distribution

Message Size Distribution

Message size distribution over all messages. Count is the number of messages within the given size range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-size.png

Size Count Percentage
2.5KiB > size >= 1.5KiB 418 26.8%
1.5KiB > size >= 0.5KiB 359 23%
3.5KiB > size >= 2.5KiB 273 17.5%
4.5KiB > size >= 3.5KiB 200 12.8%
5.5KiB > size >= 4.5KiB 94 6%
6.5KiB > size >= 5.5KiB 63 4%
7.5KiB > size >= 6.5KiB 37 2.4%
8.5KiB > size >= 7.5KiB 26 1.7%
10.5KiB > size >= 9.5KiB 16 1%
9.5KiB > size >= 8.5KiB 15 1%

DNS Block Lists

These numbers shows the presence of the sending client in a DNS block list at the time of message delivery. The selection of DNS block lists may be updated on a monthly basis.

Senders In DNS Block Lists

Sending clients present in DNS block list at the time of delivery. The count is the total number of messages delivered from clients listed in the respective block list. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

DNS block list Count Percentage
bl.spamcop.net 1246 79.8%
cbl.abuseat.org 719 46.1%
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net 709 45.4%
sbl.spamhaus.org 302 19.3%
socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net 235 15.1%
http.dnsbl.sorbs.net 196 12.6%
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net 134 8.6%
relays.visi.com 129 8.3%
misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net 37 2.4%
zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net 25 1.6%
relays.ordb.org 15 1%
smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net 2 0.1%

DNS Block List Groups

To investigate overlap of the different DNS block lists and the effectiveness of combinations of block lists, the following shows the number of messages delivered from clients listed in at least one of the groups block lists. The set of groups may be updated on a monthly basis.

all:
1464 of 1561 (93.8%)
bl.spamcop.net, cbl.abuseat.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
1399 of 1561 (89.6%)
bl.spamcop.net and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
1375 of 1561 (88.1%)
bl.spamcop.net and cbl.abuseat.org:
1299 of 1561 (83.2%)
*.dnsbl.sorbs.net:
993 of 1561 (63.6%)

SpamAssassin

All messages are filtered through SpamAssassin and reports are generated on hit rates including and excluding Bayesian classification as well as the scores from the Bayesian classifier itself. As the spam traps receive no legitimate email, the learning for the SpamAssassin Bayesian classifier is based on mail received at a different address. This can be expected to reduce the accuracy of the numbers that includes the result of the Bayesian classifier.

SpamAssassin Without Bayesian Classifier

SpamAssassin hits when disregarding the result of the Bayesian classifier. The countis the number of messages for the given score range. The percentage is relative to thetotal number of messages received within the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-sa-only.png

Hits Count Percentage
0 > hits 3 0.2%
5 > hits >= 0 452 29%
10 > hits >= 5 384 24.6%
15 > hits >= 10 285 18.3%
20 > hits >= 15 220 14.1%
hits >= 20 217 13.9%

SpamAssassin Bayesian Classifier Scores

The score of the SpamAssassin Bayesian classifier. The count is the number of messages for the given score range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-sa-bayes.png

Score Count Percentage
1.00 > score >= 0.95 1370 87.8%
0.95 > score >= 0.85 58 3.7%
0.85 > score >= 0.75 28 1.8%
0.75 > score >= 0.65 12 0.8%
0.65 > score >= 0.55 30 1.9%
0.55 > score >= 0.45 59 3.8%
0.45 > score >= 0.35 3 0.2%
0.35 > score >= 0.25 1 0.1%

SpamAssassin Including Bayesian Classifier

SpamAssassin hits including the result of the Bayesian classifier. The count is the number of messages for the given hit range. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-sa-combined.png

Hits Count Percentage
0 > hits 1 0.1%
5 > hits >= 0 98 6.3%
10 > hits >= 5 389 24.9%
15 > hits >= 10 335 21.5%
20 > hits >= 15 228 14.6%
hits >= 20 510 32.7%

Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

Number of matches for the three matching algorithms used by DCC. The DCC servers are queried at the time of delivery. The Body, Fuz1 and Fuz2 columns shows the number of messages matched in the count range for their respective algorithm. The Highest column shows the number of hits from the algorithm returning the highest match count. The percentage is relative to the total number of messages received within the reporting period.

/media/2003/12/15/oos-dcc.png

Range Body Fuz1 Fuz2 Highest
25 >= count 1468 (94%) 1226 (78.5%) 279 (17.9%) 274 (17.6%)
50 >= count > 25 2 (0.1%) 3 (0.2%) 25 (1.6%) 19 (1.2%)
75 >= count > 50 10 (0.6%) 4 (0.3%) 24 (1.5%) 23 (1.5%)
100 >= count > 75 8 (0.5%) 9 (0.6%) 30 (1.9%) 29 (1.9%)
count > 100 73 (4.7%) 319 (20.4%) 1203 (77.1%) 1216 (77.9%)

About

On the Origin Of Spam is published as weekly and monthly reports by B. Johannessen in the hope that it will be useful to the anti-spam community.